Tsiolkovsky

Prophet as mediator between “unknown intelligent forces” and Humans

Posted on by Mykola Krasnostup

Пророк Константин Эдуардович Циолковский

In the modern world many people are called prophets if the events they predict often come true. But doctors who determine the sex of an unborn child by using an ultrasound diagnostic device are not called prophets for some reason.

The deep meaning of the term “prophet” has been forgotten by people today. I will attempt to fill this gap.

A prophet is a person who contacts “unknown intelligent forces” (Nature, Gods, divine entities) and serves as a mediator between these forces and humanity, conveying their will to people in the form of prophecies. In this way, they explain the reasons for the occurrence of certain events that are hidden from the majority of people.

There is a saying: “A prophet reveals the will of the Gods…”

Throughout the history of modern humanity, there have been many such individuals. One example of a prophet is Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky.

Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky is known worldwide as the pioneer of modern astronautics, having developed the theory of rocketry. However, there is another lesser-known aspect of Tsiolkovsky, who used scientific methods to model the doctrine of the Universe’s creation and humanity’s place in it. These works by Tsiolkovsky are not widely known. Some of his prophecies have yet to be fulfilled and remain incomprehensible to representatives of modern science. But time inexorably brings the onset of these events closer…

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky attempted to look into the distant historical periods of the Universe’s development that are “beyond human comprehension” and tried to describe these periods in simple human language. Today, his articles are accessible to readers, such as “Unknown Intelligent Forces” (Russian), “Monism of the Universe” (Russian), “Wandering Atoms” (Russian), and many others.

 

“In fact, Tsiolkovsky was in constant contact with the unknown intelligent forces of the Universe. Writer Viktor Shklovsky, who met the famous sage several times and specifically traveled to Kaluga for that purpose, recorded the following conversation:

Tsiolkovsky asked me:
– Do you talk to angels?
– I answered softly, “No”.
– “By the structure of your head, you could talk to them”.
– “And you?” I asked.
– “I talk to them constantly.”
I was not frightened, understanding that an angel is inspiration.
– “They constantly disagree… the facts have a heavy nature, they depart without completing the conversation”.
(From a conversation between writer Viktor Shklovsky and Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky, 1935)

 

“…The writer Shklovsky (who, it should be noted, had an disproportionately large and cleanly shaved ‘Martian’ skull) was not afraid of the revelations of the sage. Others were taken aback. Some simply shrugged their shoulders, saying that the old man was acting strange and should see a psychiatrist. And as for what he had written, it was better to keep it hidden away. Tsiolkovsky, on the other hand, considered angels to be higher intelligent beings, more perfect than humans. According to his concept, humans in the future, through cosmoanthropogenic evolution, would transform into angels. ‘Humans will also transform,’ he wrote in the early 20th century, ‘and the old, sinful human, a predator and killer, will no longer exist on Earth. Instead, there will be their descendants, perfect angelic beings.”

Valery Demin, “Tsiolkovsky”, the series “Remarkable People’s Lives” (Russian).

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky suggested that together with people inhabit beings and entities of other worlds, just their bodies are created from less dense matter, still unknown to us, and they are invisible to us, but their power is very great, as the period of their evolution may far exceed the evolution of human beings, and perhaps the age of our universe…

But representatives of modern science, in contact with “intelligent forces” unknown to most people, are afraid to even mention this ability. And in the academic science there is a “taboo” imposed on researches in this direction for many hundreds of years. For wilfulness researchers are threatened with a ban on publications in scientific journals, closing of access to grants, dismissal, etc. Such researchers (when discovered) are wished by those around them to be brought into a similar, so-called “normal” state to them. That is why many of them have chosen “silence is gold” as a slogan of their life path… Otherwise, they will never escape grief.

Сжигание на костре ведьм, колдунов, вещунов, прорицателей...

 

Today such people are not burned at bonfires, not drowned in water and not beheaded, as it was done only a few centuries ago, but in principle, nothing has changed…

Modern researchers need to take responsibility and not look for inhabitants of other planets living in the universe many millions of light years away from us, but to look for inhabitants of other worlds, which have been dwelling here with us for a long time… From my point of view, there are already all the necessary prerequisites for this, including specialists and instrumentation, which allows to start strictly scientific research in this direction…

 

 

The Appeal to the Like-minded people – who, like me, do care about the World that we will pass on to future generations, who believe that it is necessary “to recover what got lost by humankind in multitude of millenniums, to find the philosopher’s stone it let drop» (Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, “The Living Universe”, 1923)»

Posted on by Mykola Krasnostup

Tsiolkovsky

There is a question that everyone asks himself at least once in his life. “What will I leave behind?”. People often begin seriously thinking about it after having been on the verge of death. As for me, I had started thinking this matter over when I was struggling with a severe form of COVID-19. It resulted in soul searching, and I understood several important things.

  • First, I realized that almost all modern problems of Humankind are connected with the fact that people don’t know either themselves or their place in the Universe. The COVID-19 pandemic has vividly illustrated that without answering the question “What is a HUMAN BEING?” plenty of finds and effort, invested in the fight against diseases, do not always give the desired results. Well, are all these devices, deemed “useful”, and new principles of control, REALLY effective and useful for HUMANS?
  • Also, I understood that the project named “Cosmic Philosophy of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky” (www.tsiolkovsky.org), which I started seven years ago as a hobby, has become the most important thing for me.

Why Tsiolkovsky?

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky is known all over the world as one of the founding fathers of astronautics who developed the theory of the rocketry. These works are well-known all over the world.

But there is a great part of Tsiolkovsky ‘s heritage which few people know about. Using scientific methods, the scientist worked out a doctrine regarding the Universe and the place of the Humankind in it. Tsiolkovsky stated that he developed his theory of rocketry only as an addition to his philosophical researches.

Despite the fact that the works by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky today are already in the public domain, some results of his researches are currently unknown not only to the general public, but also to narrow specialists.

What is the difference between “living” and “lifeless”? Are there any inhabitants on our planet who are more sophisticated than a Man? What is Human? Who are Spirits? What is Soul? What is an atom?

Almost all modern problems of Humankind are connected with the fact that people don’t know either themselves or their place in the Universe. The COVID-19 pandemic has vividly illustrated that without answering the question “What is a HUMAN BEING?” plenty of finds and effort, invested in the fight against diseases, do not always give the desired results. Well, are all these devices, deemed “useful”, and new principles of control, really effective and useful for HUMANS?

Tsiolkovsky’s articles are unique! They contain clear, simple, and at the same time exhaustive answers to these – and many more – complex questions.

The goal of the Project is to make philosophical works by this great Thinker available for a general audience completely free of charge.

For seven years, all works on the Project were carried out exclusively at my own expense. Today the site provides free access to the most complete collection of philosophical articles by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky on the Internet. Some articles were published by us for the very first time, since their contents were recognized from archival images of manuscripts or typescripts of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, which had never been published before, and converted into the text format.

What have we managed to do so far:

  • 174 philosophical articles have been published;
  • 21 articles were published in Russian for the first time;
  • 5 audio books in Russian and 1 audio book in English have been created;
  • 7 articles have been translated into English for the first time.

Unfortunately, due to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we are forced to look for people, organizations or companies that are interested in our Project and who can help the Project by financing translation of philosophical works of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky into Ukrainian and/or English languages, as well as creation of audio books based on collections of his articles.

We will turn all the articles by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky translated into Ukrainian and English, into electronic books in PDF format, which will be posted on www.tsiolkovsky.org website and become available to all free of charge.

For companies, organizations or individuals who will finance translation works, we offer placing information about their company on one of the pages in each e-book. Any comments and suggestions will be considered.

I am convinced that this Project is really necessary because we constantly receive letters of thanks from researchers around the world with positive feedback on our work.

I understand that now we are going through hard times: the pandemic is still going on, people are dying… There seemingly are more important issues that require funding. But all pandemics end. A new round of Life begins. Will we and our descendants be ready for it?

I hope to find like-minded people.

I would be grateful for any help to the Project named “The Cosmic Philosophy of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky” (www.tsiolkovsky.org), as well as for comments and suggestions related to the Project.

 

Sincerely,

Mykola Krasnostup

 

 

 

 

The modern fairy tales about the creation of search engines with a 100% relevance of search results

Posted on by Mykola Krasnostup

Developers of the largest Internet search engines have joined the quest for ‘relevance of search results’, which is the main parameter for modern researchers to evaluate the quality of their work.

Relevance (from Latin relevo — to pick up, to ease) in terms of information search is a semantic compatibility of a search query with a document received. In the broadest sense, ‘adequacy’ is one of the most appropriate synonym for ‘relevance’, that is, an evaluation not only of the compatibility, but also of the result practicality.

Let`s look at this situation from another “point of view”, analyzing the work of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky “A contingent truth” , which was written in 1932, where he wrote:

“There is no real (absolute) truth, because real truth must base on a full understanding of space. But there is no full understanding now and such will never be reached. The science is on the upswing, scientists are constantly rejecting or asserting something old and discovering some new information. The science changes every decade. Decades don`t deny information but change it or its content by deleting something old or adding something new. Such processes are endless, because the development of centuries and the brain building are also endless as well.

So, the truth can be only of three types: contingent, temporary and changeable.

Religious people count their dogmata the truth. But can any religion be the truth? There are thousands of religions. They contradict each other, and science very often denies them, that`s why religions cannot be considered even as a contingent truth. Political beliefs also more or less disagree. Therefore, we will say the same about them. Philosophical meditations have created worldviews. Due to many disputes over these philosophical meditations, they are perceived as personal opinions. Some philosophers used only accurate scientific knowledge for their conclusions, but their conclusions are beneath a contingent truth, since they aren`t mutually agreed. Finally, every individual understands the truth in his/her own way. Many people, many truths. What kind of truth is it!

However, we must decide what is a contingent truth for us. Philosophers, sages and scientists, of course, contribute to the distribution of knowledge about the universe and therefore, improve people`s idea about a contingent truth.

A contingent truth can be earth, folk, city, volost, rural, village, family and personal.

The human being acquires personal truth in different ways and considers it to be the best one, the most faithful and the fairest. On the average, this is the lowest kind of a contingent truth. It changes with an age and a human cognition.”

Information search of the search engine is based on the array of information it has systematized, and represents the thoughts of the human beings` PERSONALITIES that are fixed on various information carriers on the Internet.

It turns out that search engines dig for information only in the array of PERSONAL information of the human beings, which is initially subjective, i.e. it has nothing to do with such notion as TRUE!

What relevance (correspondence) of the ‘request-response’ system we are talking about?

What is the criterion for search engine`s determination 100% relevance of the response?

Continue reading →

Evaluation of people. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. 1934

Posted on by Mykola Krasnostup

tsiolkovsky_smile Let us start with the most sublime. Only history serves us as a guide.

Let us distribute people on grounds of their value, starting from the top.

Love of a few, hate of many and indifference of the majority. Their destiny is, having done their duty, to die young due to the high and mighties. A cross, a guillotine, gallows, a bullet, all sorts of torture – that is their fate. They leave neither wives, nor offspring (Giordano Bruno).

Hundreds and thousands of years pass, and fame of the tortured grows, their influence continues after their death. It yields majestic beneficent results. Humankind raise them to the rank of gods.

Some of the despised, persecuted, arrested, sentenced to penal servitude, but nevertheless dying a natural death. Their dignity grows from the day of their death and reaches a high value many centuries after (Hamilton, Kepler).

And here are genii of a bit lower rank. They are not killed, not tortured to death, but forgotten. Their works are rejected, or decay in cellars. Hundreds of years after their death they are accidentally unveiled. Dignity of a forgotten genius is restored. It also increases with centuries. Leave no offspring (Mendel).

And here is the fourth level of extraordinary people. These obtain some fame at the end of life. Youth spent in pain, frustration, poverty, in prisons. But they die a natural death, although deprivation, exhaustion, humiliation and hunger significantly shorten their lives. Leave no offspring. Examples: Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Mendeleev, Lamarck. Their fame is much greater after death. It grows from century to century.

We also have people who reach success in middle age. They endure a lot as well, but glory and correct assessment come earlier. They are comforted and rewarded with it, although in old age. Often they reach wealth and power by the end of life. Their lineage continues rarely.

At the sixth level of outstanding people we see the following: quick success in youth, honor and wealth. Their works are highly valued after death as well, but do not live for hundreds of years. Offspring, if any, is miserable.

The seventh level: loud practical success, career, conquests, throne. Highly praised only while alive. Estimation is ambivalent. After death, it falls and reaches negative value.

Continue reading →

Creatures from Different Stages of Evolution. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.

Posted on by Mykola Krasnostup

tsiolkovsky_smile A molecule, according to our hypothesis, is an infinitely complex matter. Creatures known to us – as well as those who supposedly live close to suns and on planets – are composed or built from molecules of different types (oxygen, hydrogen, iron, carbon, etc.). Let’s look back to the past and imagine the Universe billions of decillions – or as many as you like – years ago. At that time molecules were less complex, and there were other planets, other suns and other creatures, composed from these more simple molecules. When forming chemical compounds, they emitted light of other kind, which now is invisible for us; it couldn’t be perceived by our organs of sight because the size of ether waves was smaller at that time and ether environment was different – thinner and more resilient. Creatures of those days were less dense but they also were subject to evolution, they also struggled for existence; they also became – ages ago – the acme of perfection, and they became immortal rulers of the world, they achieved what humans still are to achieve and what space dwellers akin to us have already achieved, and they obtained bliss.

Could they manage to survive up to now and are they living among us invisible? Or maybe they decomposed, giving birth to creatures of our visible world?

This issue is rather difficult to tackle. A philosopher would say that the origin of matter is common; however, matter, undergoing continuous and, as it seems, simultaneous evolution, exists it in the great number of kinds: from dense metals to ether, which is trillions of times less dense.

If the previous types of unorganized matter somehow managed to preserve, having no intelligence, all the more reason sentient beings could preserve.

Bacteria and the other Protista have existed for ages, but they gave birth to other beings, including humans. But do invisible suns, planets and creatures surround us, like bacteria, which only now humans are able to see? Where do these higher ones live?

Do they inhabit only certain corners of Universe or are they dissipated everywhere and can live wherever they want? What are their properties? Do they have any connections with currently existing creatures? Do they represent the beginning of life for humans and celestial creatures – related to them, although perfect? Or do they represent their soul (or its part)? Do they for some purpose possess animals or humans at conception? Odd questions with no answers. All the same, let’s try to answer the last question, i.e. do these creatures of the past serve as a foundation of a man, do they enter his body at birth and do they represent his soul with its properties?

But, firstly, all properties of a man’s body and soul find explanation in morphology of his body and brain. And even if not all of them are explained yet, we can hope that in future they will be.

Secondly, if these beings enliven a man, it is difficult to deny the same to an animal. At conception all of them must be inhabited by spirits from earlier days. It looks rather odd! Why do they need suffer in animal and human bodies?! And, finally, why then a man or an animal does not become perfect (in its way) immediately, if a spirit inhabits him at birth? Why a baby is not so clever, as an adult? Why do we acquire intelligence by means of schooling and labor? How does perfection of spirit always depend on the type of animals and perfection of their organs? (To explain this, there is a lousy hypothesis about prestabilism). Why does with destruction of organs spirit weaken as well? Why a higher spirit doesn’t take possession of some fly and turn it into Newton?

Continue reading →